Posted on April 29, 2015 in Family Law

When thinking about child marriage laws, many people’s first thought is of the child brides in third world countries in Africa or Asia. However, in a recent study, it seems that the child marriage laws in the United States and Canada have a lot more in common with Saudi Arabia, Niger, and Bolivia, than with Western Europe. This is because in the vast majority of countries around the world, minors under the age of 18 are not legally permitted to marry, or if they are, it is only with court approval and/or pregnancy. Many are currently pushing to increase the minimum age to marry regardless of parental consent and/or religious law all around the world, including the United States and Canada.

The United States

The United States, since the 1990s, has experienced a substantial increase in teen marriage due to the expansive proliferation of abstinence-only sex education. In many states in the U.S., many teenagers are able to wed at the age of 14 or 15. Though teen marriages at these ages are rare, the fact that most states set the minimum age at 16 still has an influential impact on teenagers, especially girls, who may be forced into marriage due to pressures exerted by the family and cultural conservatism within the community. In many states, the younger age limit is taken advantage of to push minors, who may be the victims of statutory rape, into a marriage to legitimize the misconduct that occurred.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 22, 2015 in Immigration

Being in immigration proceedings is frightening for most people. When they are told that their offerings are not enough, it can get even worse. Yet, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) routinely requests further evidence from those in proceedings, for a variety of reasons. If you receive one of these notices, it is important to understand it fully and not panic.

Requests for Evidence

Requests for Evidence (RFEs) can come from any immigration official once you are in proceedings, at any stage of review from then on. While usually they are simply to address any gaps in your information, at times, they can be issued erroneously or even used as ways to fish for potentially damaging information that is not truly relevant to your case. The significant majority, however, are genuine requests for further information, or to clarify something that the officer feels has not been fully explained.

It is important not to panic if you receive one of these. An RFE does not mean that your case will be denied or that there is something fundamentally wrong. However, it does mean that you need to obtain the information in question and reply within the time frame stated. Usually, this is 90 days, though the specific amount of time you will have to reply will usually be stated in the request itself. It does also mean that you must be able to interpret what is being requested. Sometimes, the request may not cite any specific documents; it will merely ask, for example, for “further evidence” regarding a specific criteria of your application. A potential asylee may be asked to provide “further evidence” of their alleged persecution. In these situations, a good immigration attorney can be a huge advantage.

Notices of Intent to Deny

Where an RFE is not necessarily a moment to panic, if you receive a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), that is potentially more serious. A NOID is issued in a few different situations, some of which are:

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 15, 2015 in Immigration

When you decide to marry a non-U.S. citizen and reside in the United States, there are significant bureaucratic obstacles that must be satisfied before you and your soon-to-be spouse can reside happily ever after. The one thing that many mixed-citizen couples do not take into consideration is the fact that once they have tied the knot, they are bound together for life, even if they decide to divorce.

Affidavit of Support

The United States, when permitting non-U.S. citizens to reside in the United States with their U.S. citizen spouses, requires that the U.S. citizen spouses sign an affidavit of support, which is an affidavit that the petitioner (usually the U.S. citizen) signs to declare that they will accept the financial burden and responsibility for the non-U.S. citizen so that the non-U.S. citizen does not become a ward of the state. In other words, by signing the affidavit of support, the U.S. citizen is agreeing to a legally enforceable agreement that he or she will provide lifetime alimony to their non-U.S. citizen spouse.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 15, 2015 in Immigration

In a perfect world, a person who has come before an immigration judge has to wait very little time to move on with his or her life. However, given the United States’ extensive immigration court backlog and current culture of xenophobia, many immigrants who have been through the deportation and appeals processes still find themselves in legal limbo afterward, for reasons both appropriate and misguided.

Post-Order Custody

ICE used to be able to hold people indefinitely. However, in 2001, the Supreme Court decided the case of Zadvydas v. Davis, in which it was held that indefinite detention of (theoretically removable) aliens was impermissible in cases when the alien was not likely to be removed in the near future. In other words, if mere bureaucracy is holding up your departure, or a conflict that makes it temporarily unsafe to return to your home country, you are still permitted to be detained. If circumstances exist that mean your country will be unsafe or unreachable for the foreseeable future, you will be much more likely to receive a supervised release, or parole. While this decision only applied to admissible aliens, the court decided Clark v. Martinez three years later, extending the same standard to the undocumented.

Since Zadvydas was decided, the procedure underwent some modifications. Nowadays, after a final order has been entered in your case, Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) has 90 days to remove you from the country. That period of time does not begin to run unless you have exhausted your appeals and there are no stays pending in your case. However, once it does begin to run, you must be removed during that 90 days. If you are not, you are entitled to a review of your detention.

If you are still in detention after the 90 days has elapsed, you are entitled to have your deportation officer conduct a review of your case. There are rare exceptions to this rule, namely if you have a communicable and dangerous disease or are a significant security risk, but otherwise, you are entitled to a review.

Am I Entitled to Review?

Not everyone is entitled to a review of their post-order status, but many are. In order to determine whether the Zadvydas or Martinez standards apply to you, you must fit the following criteria:

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 13, 2015 in Personal Injury

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 12, 2015 in Personal Injury

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 09, 2015 in Immigration

There is much misinformation out in the media about the legal nature of immigration violations. Many believe that if someone is present in the U.S. without documentation, they are committing a crime. Technically, this is not so, aside from in very exceptional cases. Others wonder why it matters--the answer is because a criminal record is a very different matter than a record of civil infractions, for immigration purposes and otherwise. If you are in the U.S. without documentation, it is absolutely imperative that you know what manner of act you have actually committed.

Unlawful Presence

Unlawful presence is exactly what it sounds like - being present in the United States without benefit of legal status. However, lack of ‘legal status’ can be somewhat misleading to the average person, making it sound as though it is a crime, when in reality, unlawful presence is a civil infraction.

It is interesting to note that Congress actually had the opportunity in 2005 to criminalize unlawful presence, and declined to do so. The Sensenbrenner Immigration Bill, the short name for the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005, would have made unlawful presence a felony, regardless of circumstance, but after demonstrations around the nation, the Senate voted the bill down.

The only time mere unlawful presence (without any compounding actions) can result in criminal penalties is if it occurs after a person has been formally removed from the country, and then returns without leave to do so. If someone re-enters the U.S. when they have a previous standing removal order, they are at risk of being arrested and sentenced to prison. Most sentences are around two years, but it can vary. If you entered the United States legally, but are accruing unlawful presence, you will likely be subject to deportation, but you have not committed any crime under U.S. law (with very rare exceptions).

Unlawful Entry

Unlike merely being present unlawfully, entering the country without inspection is a federal crime, according to 8 U.S.C. §1325. It can be a felony, but is most often characterized as a misdemeanor punishable by fines and/or jail terms of no less than six months (but normally no more than two years).

One might wonder how someone can be unlawfully present in the U.S. and not have entered unlawfully, but it is in reality quite common. Many who find themselves in this position legally obtain visas and then simply fail to leave before the visa’s expiration date. They enter the country legally, with inspection, but as soon as their visa expires, they begin to accrue unlawful presence. In that scenario, the person would be guilty of a civil infraction, but no crime has been committed.

If you entered the United States without inspection, you are guilty of both the civil infraction of unlawful presence, and the crime of unlawful entry. You are subject to deportation, but you may also be subject to fines and a two-year jail sentence.

Get An Immigration Attorney On Your Side

If you need help with a potential immigration violation, or you need guidance on which penalties you may be subject to, having a good immigration attorney on your side can make all the difference. The skilled DuPage County immigration and deportation attorneys at Mevorah & Giglio Law Offices have years of experience in these cases, and will do our very best to help you with yours. Contact us today.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 08, 2015 in Family Law

In the United States, defendants who have been accused of domestic abuse are provided with the benefits of the law, regardless of whether they are guilty or innocent. Most times, victims of domestic abuse are not able to easily prove that they have been the subject of abuse by their perpetrator, either because they are scared of the abusers, they love the abusers (regardless of the treatment that they are receiving), and/or there is very little evidence that could be shown to the police. It becomes a he-said, she-said situation, which our criminal justice system has a hard time assessing and evaluating.

Hearsay Evidence Rules

In court, when oral or written statements are brought in as evidence, the law of “hearsay” governs the admissibility of the statements. Hearsay is any out-of-court oral or written statement that is brought in to assert the truth of the matter that is at issue. Except for some outlined exceptions, hearsay is generally not admissible as truth, but could be brought in for another purpose, such as showing that the person had a bias or had received notice, regardless of whether the information held within the statement is true or not.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 07, 2015 in Personal Injury

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on April 03, 2015 in Personal Injury

Continue Reading ››